The now commonly-used English idiom “God forbid” was first coined in 1560 in the Geneva Bible. (Source: Crystal 2010, p. 273)
For other idioms in English that were coined by Bible translation, see here.
οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι τὰ σώματα ὑμῶν μέλη Χριστοῦ ἐστιν; ἄρας οὖν τὰ μέλη τοῦ Χριστοῦ ποιήσω πόρνης μέλη; μὴ γένοιτο.
15Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Should I therefore take the members of Christ and make them members of a prostitute? Never!
Following are a number of back-translations of 1 Corinthians 6:15:
The Greek Christos (Χρηστός) is typically transliterated when it appears together with Iésous (Ἰησοῦς) (Jesus). In English the transliteration is the Anglicized “Christ,” whereas in many other languages it is based on the Greek or Latin as “Kristus,” “Cristo,” or similar.
When used as a descriptive term in the New Testament — as it’s typically done in the gospels (with the possible exceptions of for instance John 1:17 and 17:3) — Christos is seen as the Greek translation of the Hebrew mashiaḥ (המשיח) (“anointed”). Accordingly, a transliteration of mashiaḥ is used, either as “Messiah” or based on the Greek or Latin as a form of “Messias.”
This transliteration is also used in the two instances where the Greek term Μεσσίας (Messias) is used in John 1:41 and 4:25.
In some languages and some translations, the term “Messiah” is supplemented with an explanation. Such as in the German Gute Nachricht with “the Messiah, the promised savior” (Wir haben den Messias gefunden, den versprochenen Retter) or in Muna with “Messiah, the Saving King” (Mesias, Omputo Fosalamatino) (source: René van den Berg).
In predominantly Muslim areas or for Bible translations for a Muslim target group, Christos is usually transliterated from the Arabic al-Masih (ٱلْمَسِيحِ) — “Messiah.” In most cases, this practice corresponds with languages that also use a form of the Arabic Isa (عيسى) for Jesus (see Jesus). There are some exceptions, though, including modern translations in Arabic which use Yasua (يَسُوعَ) (coming from the Aramaic Yēšūa’) alongside a transliteration of al-Masih, Hausa which uses Yesu but Almahisu, and some Fula languages (Adamawa Fulfulde, Nigerian Fulfulde, and Central-Eastern Niger Fulfulde) which also use a form of Iésous (Yeesu) but Almasiihu (or Almasiifu) for Christos.
In Indonesian, while most Bible translations had already used Yesus Kristus rather than Isa al Masih, three public holidays used to be described using the term Isa Al Masih. From 2024 the government will use Yesus Kristus in those holiday names instead (see this article in Christianity Today ).
Other solutions that are used by a number of languages include these:
In Finnish Sign Language both “Christ” and “Messiah” are translated with sign signifying “king.” (Source: Tarja Sandholm)
“Christ / Messiah” in Finnish Sign Language (source )
“Another important word in the New Testament that comes from the Septuagint is christos, ‘Christ.’ Christ is not part of the name of the man from Nazareth, as if ‘the Christs’ were written above the door of his family home. Rather, ‘Christ’ is an explicitly messianic title used by the writers of the New Testament who have learned this word from the Septuagint’s translation of the Hebrew mashiach, ‘anointed,’ which itself is often rendered in English as ‘Messiah.’ To be sure, one detects a messianic intent on the part of the Septuagint translator in some places. Amos 4:13 may have been one of these. In the Hebrew Bible, God ‘reveals his thoughts to mortals,’ but the Septuagint has ‘announcing his anointed to humans.’ A fine distinction must be made, however, between theology that was intended by the Septuagint translators and that developed by later Christian writers. In Amos 4:13 it is merely possible we have a messianic reading, but it is unquestionably the case that the New Testament writers exploit the Septuagint’s use of christos, in Amos and elsewhere, to messianic ends.”
The Greek for Do you not know in this verse and in verse 16 is the same (see comments on 3.16). However, the content of the two verses suggests that verse 15a contains traditional teaching that the Corinthians had already been given. Verse 16a, though, introduces new teaching that should be immediately obvious to the Corinthian Christians, especially in the light of the Old Testament quotation in verse 16b.
As elsewhere, Rom 11.16-24 for example, Paul’s use of figurative language is a little confused. In this verse the bodies [plural] of Christians are described as parts or organs of the body of Christ. Later in 12.12-27 it is clear that Paul is describing individual Christians as parts or organs of the body of Christ, which is the church (see also Rom 12.5). The difference between this passage and chapter 12 is that Paul is not at present concerned with unity and diversity within the church, but rather with its purity. Members of Christ (Good News Bible‘s “part of Christ’s body”) here as in chapter 12 means the church. Paul’s point at the moment is that the members belong to Christ and must therefore be holy.
In the second half of the verse, as in verse 12b, Paul takes himself as an example. As in Rom 7.7-25, Paul writes I but includes other people in addition to himself. In some languages it may therefore be necessary to use an inclusive “we.” The meaning is not very clear either in Greek or in English, but Paul explains himself in the next verse. The meaning of the Greek word translated take is usually “take away” (Translator’s New Testament, An American Translation). Barclay brings out the full meaning by translating “And am I then going to take the limbs that rightly belong to Christ and make them the limbs that belong to a prostitute?” Shall I … take is a rhetorical question that in many languages may be translated as a statement; for example, “I would never take….”
The words take and make are really part of a single action or event, as in the English phrase “come and see.”
The word prostitute is clearly feminine in the Greek text. Prostitute in many languages will be expressed figuratively; for example, “woman who sells her body,” or “woman of the night.”
Never! translates a Greek phrase that is frequently used in the theological arguments of Romans and Galatians (see, for example, Rom 11.11; Gal 2.17), but it is not used elsewhere in 1-2 Corinthians. There is no reference to God here, although King James Version has “God forbid.” The phrase means literally “let (it) not be.” One could also render it as “certainly not” or “that is impossible!”
Quoted with permission from Ellingworth, Paul and Hatton, Howard A. A Handbook on Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians, 2nd edition. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1985/1994. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
No comments yet.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.