Translation commentary on 1 Samuel 13:22

So: the common Hebrew conjunction followed by the verb “to be” is rightly taken as a logical transition marker resuming the story following the parenthetical explanation about the reason for the absence of swords and spears on the side of the Israelites. La Bible du Semeur translates the transition more specifically as “That is why,” showing more clearly that the previous verses provide an explanation as to why only Saul and Jonathan had metal weapons.

On the day of battle: Revised English Bible says “when war broke out.”

Good News Translation has restructured this verse since the Hebrew style tends to be heavy in English. Another possible model for restructuring this verse may read:

• Therefore only Saul and Jonathan, his son, had swords and spears when the battle [with the Philistines] began. None of the other Israelite soldiers had such weapons.

Quoted with permission from Omanson, Roger L. and Ellington, John E. A Handbook on the First and Second Books of Samuel, Volume 1. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2001. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .