The Greek and Hebrew that are translated as “worry” or “anxious” in English are translated in Navajo as “my mind is killing me.” (Source: Nida 1952, p. 24)
Nida (1952, p. 124) also gives other examples:
“The Piro in Peru use almost the same idiom when they say that a worried man is ‘one who is hard chased.’ The worried person is like a pursued animal in the forest trying to elude the hunter. The impenetrable jungle of the future, the failing strength, and the exhaustion of doubt all press hard upon the soul. And one’s heart seems to fail and even disappear. This is the very phrase employed by the Tzeltal Indians in the rugged mountains of southern Mexico. They describe ‘worry’ by the words ‘their hearts are gone.'”
See also anxious / worried about many things and worries/cares of the world/this age.
Following are a number of back-translations of Luke 12:25:
- Noongar: “I ask, can you live longer just because you want this?” (Source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang)
- Uma: “What also is the use of your having very much thinking/worry? Because even if we are continually busy thinking, we are not able to add-to our age even just one night.” (Source: Uma Back Translation)
- Yakan: “Who of you can lengthen his life even for one hour if you worry about it?” (Source: Yakan Back Translation)
- Western Bukidnon Manobo: “And no matter how a person cherishes his life, there is no way that he can lengthen it by even just a little.” (Source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
- Kankanaey: “Another thing, even if you worry constantly, can you do-you-suppose make-longer your lives by even one hour?” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
- Tagbanwa: “Well, which of you could add to his life even a little time through agitating his mind/thinking? Of course none.” (Source: Tagbanwa Back Translation)
Like many languages (but unlike Greek or Hebrew or English), Tuvan uses a formal vs. informal 2nd person pronoun (a familiar vs. a respectful “you”). Unlike other languages that have this feature, however, the translators of the Tuvan Bible have attempted to be very consistent in using the different forms of address in every case a 2nd person pronoun has to be used in the translation of the biblical text.
As Voinov shows in Pronominal Theology in Translating the Gospels (in: The Bible Translator 2002, p. 210ff.), the choice to use either of the pronouns many times involved theological judgment. While the formal pronoun can signal personal distance or a social/power distance between the speaker and addressee, the informal pronoun can indicate familiarity or social/power equality between speaker and addressee.
Here, Jesus is addressing his disciples, individuals and/or crowds with the formal pronoun, showing respect.
In most Dutch translations, Jesus addresses his disciples and common people with the informal pronoun, whereas they address him with the formal form.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.