sin

The Hebrew and Greek that is typically translated as “sin” in English has a wide variety of translations.

The Greek ἁμαρτάνω (hamartanō) carries the original verbatim meaning of “miss the mark.” Likewise, many translations contain the “connotation of moral responsibility.” Loma has (for certain types of sin) “leaving the road” (which “implies a definite standard, the transgression of which is sin”) or Navajo uses “that which is off to the side.” (Source: Bratcher / Nida). In Toraja-Sa’dan the translation is kasalan, which originally meant “transgression of a religious or moral rule” and has shifted its meaning in the context of the Bible to “transgression of God’s commandments.” (Source: H. van der Veen in The Bible Translator 1950, p. 21ff. ).

In Shipibo-Conibo the term is hocha. Nida (1952, p. 149) tells the story of its choosing: “In some instances a native expression for sin includes many connotations, and its full meaning must be completely understood before one ever attempts to use it. This was true, for example, of the term hocha first proposed by Shipibo-Conibo natives as an equivalent for ‘sin.’ The term seemed quite all right until one day the translator heard a girl say after having broken a little pottery jar that she was guilty of ‘hocha.’ Breaking such a little jar scarcely seemed to be sin. However, the Shipibos insisted that hocha was really sin, and they explained more fully the meaning of the word. It could be used of breaking a jar, but only if the jar belonged to someone else. Hocha was nothing more nor less than destroying the possessions of another, but the meaning did not stop with purely material possessions. In their belief God owns the world and all that is in it. Anyone who destroys the work and plan of God is guilty of hocha. Hence the murderer is of all men most guilty of hocha, for he has destroyed God’s most important possession in the world, namely, man. Any destructive and malevolent spirit is hocha, for it is antagonistic and harmful to God’s creation. Rather than being a feeble word for some accidental event, this word for sin turned out to be exceedingly rich in meaning and laid a foundation for the full presentation of the redemptive act of God.”

In Kaingang, the translation is “break God’s word” and in Sandawe the original meaning of the Greek term (see above) is perfectly reflected with “miss the mark.” (Source: Ursula Wiesemann in Holzhausen / Riderer 2010, p. 36ff., 43)

In Warao it is translated as “bad obojona.” Obojona is a term that “includes the concepts of consciousness, will, attitude, attention and a few other miscellaneous notions.” (Source: Henry Osborn in The Bible Translator 1969, p. 74ff. ). See other occurrences of Obojona in the Warao New Testament.

Martin Ehrensvärd, one of the translators for the Danish Bibelen 2020, comments on the translation of this term: “We would explain terms, such that e.g. sin often became ‘doing what God does not want’ or ‘breaking God’s law’, ‘letting God down’, ‘disrespecting God’, ‘doing evil’, ‘acting stupidly’, ‘becoming guilty’. Now why couldn’t we just use the word sin? Well, sin in contemporary Danish, outside of the church, is mostly used about things such as delicious but unhealthy foods. Exquisite cakes and chocolates are what a sin is today.” (Source: Ehrensvärd in HIPHIL Novum 8/2023, p. 81ff. )

See also sinner.

Translation commentary on Numbers 7:24 - 7:29

On the third day Eliab the son of Helon, the leader of the men of Zebulun …: Verses 24-29 are almost identical to verses 12-17 (see the comments there). For Eliab the son of Helon, the leader of the men of Zebulun, see 1.9. Instead of referring to “the tribe of Zebulun” (compare verse 12), the text here says the men of Zebulun (literally “the sons of Zebulun”), which may be rendered “the people of Zebulun” (New International Version) or simply “the Zebulunites” (New Jerusalem Bible).

There are no verbs corresponding to the verb was in the Hebrew of verses 25 and 29 (compare verse 17), which is in line with the list character of the text where there is a tendency to include a certain amount of condensation as the sequence progresses. By including the verb was in these verses, Revised Standard Version somewhat changes the text from a list to a narrative. The Revised Standard Version rendering of verses 24-29 could be adjusted and cast into a list as follows:

24 On the third day: Eliab the son of Helon, the leader of the people of Zebulun.
25 His offering:
one silver bowl (weight: a hundred and thirty shekels),
one silver basin (weight: seventy shekels, according to the shekel of the sanctuary),
both of them full of fine flour mixed with oil for a cereal offering;
26 one golden bowl (weight: ten shekels),
full of incense;
27 one young bull, one ram, one male lamb a year old, for a burnt offering;
28 one male goat for a sin offering;
29 and for the sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five male goats, and five male lambs a year old.
The offering of Eliab the son of Helon.

This model could be used for the other eleven paragraphs in verses 12-83. By using it, the form calls attention to its function as an official record or list, even though it occurs within the context of a narrative report. However, in some languages a verb meaning “offer” may still be needed in connection with each leader (for example, verses 24-25a may be rendered “On the third day Eliab the son of Helon, the leader of the people of Zebulun, 25 offered these things:…”). In other languages there may be some type of discourse marker or technical term that immediately signals the genre of such a listing of items. In any case, the same discourse genre should be used in translation if one is available in the target language.

Quoted with permission from de Regt, Lénart J. and Wendland, Ernst R. A Handbook on Numbers. (UBS Helps for Translators). Miami: UBS, 2016. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .