proverbs

The Hebrew that is rendered in English as “proverbs” (or “Proverbs” as the title of the book) is translated into Pökoot as ngötïnyö (or Ngötïnyö), which refers to use of figurative language that is used in such a way that things are being said in an indirect way. At the same time they communicate general wisdom.

David

The name that is transliterated as “David” in English is translated in Spanish Sign Language with the sign signifying king and a sling (referring to 1 Samuel 17:49 and 2 Samuel 5:4). (Source: John Elwode in The Bible Translator 2008, p. 78ff.)


“Elizabeth” in Spanish Sign Language, source: Sociedad Bíblica de España

In German Sign Language it is only the sling. (See here ).


“David” in German Sign Language (source )

The (Protestant) Mandarin Chinese transliteration of “David” is 大卫 (衛) / Dàwèi which carries an additional meaning of “Great Protector.”

Click or tap here to see a short video clip about David (source: Bible Lands 2012)

Translation commentary on Proverbs 1:1

“The proverbs of Solomon”: “Proverbs” translates the plural form of the Hebrew word mashal, which covers a much wider range of meaning than the English word “proverb.” In this title the term refers to teaching or wisdom literature either spoken or written by Solomon, or attributed to his name. According to 1 Kgs 4.32 Solomon “uttered three thousand proverbs (Hebrew mashal); and his songs were a thousand and five.” This may mean that he “composed” (New Revised Standard Version, Good News Translation) that many proverbs and songs, but it need not be taken that way.

The term “proverbs” is difficult in some languages, because even though there may be terms for different kinds of sayings, none of these may be as wide in meaning as the Hebrew term here. In such cases translators often choose a more general expression such as “wise talk,” “wise sayings,” or “good words.”

In many languages the construction “proverbs of Solomon” is unclear, as it is in English. It may be taken to mean, for example, that Solomon wrote these sayings, or that he owned them, or that he dictated them. The problem becomes even more difficult because chapters 1–9 may not even be recognized in many languages as being related to the kinds of sayings classed as “proverbs.” Translators seem to have two choices:

(1) to leave the construction unclear, or
(2) to translate with a term or expression that shows Solomon to be the author, such as “the ‘proverbs’ that Solomon composed.”

In either case it is advisable to provide a note to explain that the expression “proverbs of Solomon” may be taken to mean that the book is dedicated to him.

“Son of David” identifies Solomon in relation to his father, David (2 Sam 12.24).

“King of Israel” refers to Solomon, not to David. Many translations depend on punctuation to show that Solomon is called “king of Israel”. However, for public reading punctuation often fails to make clear what is meant. Good News Translation “and King of Israel” may be a helpful model in some languages. In others some restructuring, such as “King Solomon of Israel, the son of David” (Contemporary English Version), may be clearer.

In languages in which the title “king” is unknown, it may be possible to use an equivalent title such as “chief” or “the highest ruler.” If this is not satisfactory, it is often possible to say something like “who ruled over Israel.”

Some translators may find that verse 1 functions best as a heading for the Introduction and therefore may wish to place it in bold letters or in whatever form titles or headings are given in the translation. Others may find it better to render verse 1, for example, “These are the wise words spoken by Solomon who was king of Israel and David’s son.” Die Bibel im heutigen Deutsch includes in verse 1 something of the purpose: “Counsel for living through Proverbs composed by Solomon. . ..”

Quoted with permission from Reyburn, William D. and Fry, Euan McG. A Handbook on Proverbs. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2000. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

king

Some languages do not have a concept of kingship and therefore no immediate equivalent for the Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, and Latin that is translated as “king” in English. Here are some (back-) translations:

(Click or tap here to see details)

  • Piro: “a great one”
  • Highland Totonac: “the big boss”
  • Huichol: “the one who commanded” (source for this and above: Bratcher / Nida)
  • Ekari: “the one who holds the country” (source: Reiling / Swellengrebel)
  • Una: weik sienyi: “big headman” (source: Kroneman 2004, p. 407)
  • Pass Valley Yali: “Big Man” (source: Daud Soesilo)
  • Ninia Yali: “big brother with the uplifted name” (source: Daud Soesilio in Noss 2007, p. 175)
  • Nyamwezi: mutemi: generic word for ruler, by specifying the city or nation it becomes clear what kind of ruler (source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific translation notes in Paratext)
  • Ghomála’: Fo (“The word Fo refers to the paramount ruler in the kingdoms of West Cameroon. He holds administrative, political, and religious power over his own people, who are divided into two categories: princes (descendants of royalty) and servants (everyone else).” (Source: Michel Kenmogne in Theologizing in Context: An Example from the Study of a Ghomala’ Christian Hymn))

Faye Edgerton retells how the term in Navajo was determined:

“[This term was] easily expressed in the language of Biblical culture, which had kings and noblemen with their brilliant trappings and their position of honor and praise. But leadership among the Navajos is not accompanied by any such titles or distinctions of dress. Those most respected, especially in earlier days, were their headmen, who were the leaders in raids, and the shaman, who was able to serve the people by appealing for them to the gods, or by exorcising evil spirits. Neither of these made any outward show. Neither held his position by political intrigue or heredity. If the headman failed consistently in raids, he was superceded by a better warrior. If the shaman failed many times in his healing ceremonies, it was considered that he was making mistakes in the chants, or had lost favor with the gods, and another was sought. The term Navajos use for headman is derived from a verb meaning ‘to move the head from side to side as in making an oration.’ The headman must be a good orator, able to move the people to go to war, or to follow him in any important decision. This word is naat’áanii which now means ‘one who rules or bosses.’ It is employed now for a foreman or boss of any kind of labor, as well as for the chairman of the tribal council. So in order to show that the king is not just a common boss but the highest ruler, the word ‘aláahgo, which expresses the superlative degree, was put before naat’áanii, and so ‘aláahgo naat’áanii ‘anyone-more-than-being around-he-moves-his-head-the-one-who’ means ‘the highest ruler.’ Naat’áanii was used for governor as the context usually shows that the person was a ruler of a country or associated with kings.”

(Source: Faye Edgerton in The Bible Translator 1962, p. 25ff. )