mercy

Click here to view graphically

The Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Latin terms that are typically translated as “mercy” (or “compassion” or “kindness”) in English are translated in various ways. Bratcher / Nida classify them in (1) those based on the quality of heart, or other psychological center, (2) those which introduce the concept of weeping or extreme sorrow, (3) those which involve willingness to look upon and recognize the condition of others, or (4) those which involve a variety of intense feelings.

While the English mercy originates from the Latin merces, originally “price paid,” Romance languages (Italian, Spanish, Corsican, Catalan) and other Germanic languages (German, Swedish, Danish — Barmherzigkeit, barmhärtighet and barmhjertighed, respectively) tend to follow the Latin misericordia, lit. “misery-heart.”

Here are some other (back-) translations:

See also steadfast love.

Abraham

The name that is transliterated as “Abraham” in English is translated in virtually all sign languages, including American Sign Language with the sign signifying “hold back arm” (referring to Genesis 22:12).


“Abraham” in American Sign Language (source )

In Tira it is transliterated as Abaram. The choice of this, rather than the widely-known “Ibrahim,” as used in the Tira translation of the Qu’ran, was to offset it against the Muslim transliteration which originates from Arabic. (Source: J.A. Naudé, C.L. Miller Naudé, J.O. Obono in Acta Theologica 43/2, 2023, p. 129ff. )

Click or tap here to see two short video clips about Abraham (source: Bible Lands 2012)

See also our ancestor Abraham and Abram.

addressing God

Translators of different languages have found different ways with what kind of formality God is addressed. The first example is from a language where God is always addressed distinctly formal whereas the second is one where the opposite choice was made.

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight

Like many languages (but unlike Greek or Hebrew or English), Tuvan uses a formal vs. informal 2nd person pronoun (a familiar vs. a respectful “you”). Unlike other languages that have this feature, however, the translators of the Tuvan Bible have attempted to be very consistent in using the different forms of address in every case a 2nd person pronoun has to be used in the translation of the biblical text.

As Voinov shows in Pronominal Theology in Translating the Gospels (in: The Bible Translator 2002, p. 210ff.), the choice to use either of the pronouns many times involved theological judgment. While the formal pronoun can signal personal distance or a social/power distance between the speaker and addressee, the informal pronoun can indicate familiarity or social/power equality between speaker and addressee.

In these verses, in which humans address God, the informal, familiar pronoun is used that communicates closeness.

Voinov notes that “in the Tuvan Bible, God is only addressed with the informal pronoun. No exceptions. An interesting thing about this is that I’ve heard new Tuvan believers praying with the formal form to God until they are corrected by other Christians who tell them that God is close to us so we should address him with the informal pronoun. As a result, the informal pronoun is the only one that is used in praying to God among the Tuvan church.”

In Gbaya, “a superior, whether father, uncle, or older brother, mother, aunt, or older sister, president, governor, or chief, is never addressed in the singular unless the speaker intends a deliberate insult. When addressing the superior face to face, the second person plural pronoun ɛ́nɛ́ or ‘you (pl.)’ is used, similar to the French usage of vous.

Accordingly, the translators of the current version of the Gbaya Bible chose to use the plural ɛ́nɛ́ to address God. There are a few exceptions. In Psalms 86:8, 97:9, and 138:1, God is addressed alongside other “gods,” and here the third person pronoun o is used to avoid confusion about who is being addressed. In several New Testament passages (Matthew 21:23, 26:68, 27:40, Mark 11:28, Luke 20:2, 23:37, as well as in Jesus’ interaction with Pilate and Jesus’ interaction with the Samaritan woman at the well) the less courteous form for Jesus is used to indicate ignorance of his position or mocking (source Philip Noss).

In Dutch and Western Frisian translations, however, God is always addressed with the formal pronoun.

See also female second person singular pronoun in Psalms.

Translation commentary on The Prayer of Azariah and the Song of the Three Young Men 1:12

If integrated into the book of Daniel: 3.35

Do not withdraw thy mercy from us: Good News Translation has a much better choice of a verb here: “Do not withhold your mercy from us.” In the sorry state in which the exiles were living, it is more appropriate to have them asking God to show mercy, rather than to have them asking him to not take it away. So we may translate “Please keep on showing mercy to us.”

For the sake of Abraham … Isaac … and Israel …: God will have to show mercy by allowing the Jews to continue to exist, if he is to keep the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Israel (Good News Translation “Jacob”), which are recounted in the next verse. No matter how unworthy the present generation may be, for the sake of the ancient worthies Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, God will have to show mercy. This is the logic behind Good News Translation with “Keep your promises to Abraham….”

For Abraham thy beloved … Isaac thy servant … Israel thy holy one, compare Isa 41.8:

But you, Israel, my servant,
Jacob, whom I have chosen,
the offspring of Abraham, my friend.

Moore translates Abraham thy beloved as “Abraham your friend” in the light of the Isaiah passage. This is understandable, but perhaps unwarranted. The text only says “Abraham whom you loved.” The odd thing about this list is that Israel (Jacob) is called thy holy one. Elsewhere in Scripture the people of Israel are referred to as holy (for example, Deut 7.6), but nowhere is the man Israel (Jacob) called God’s holy one. Good News Translation takes liberty in interpreting this to mean “Jacob, the father of your holy people Israel.” This too is understandable but perhaps unwarranted; “Israel, your chosen one” is better. This is a unique passage, and it is probably wiser to let it remain so. Some translators may wish to substitute “Jacob” for “Israel” however.

Contemporary English Version has a helpful alternative model for this verse:

• You loved Abraham;
Isaac obeyed you,
and you chose Jacob.
For their sakes, don’t take
your mercy from us.

Quoted with permission from Bullard, Roger A. and Hatton, Howard A. A Handbook on The Shorter Books of the Deuterocanon. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2006. For this and other handbooks for translators see here.