The Greek that is translated in English as “wise as serpents” is translated in Bambam as “take-guard like a langkasi (= a small animal similar to a squirrel).”
Phil Campbell explains: “The Bambam people just could not connect with the snakes as being shrewd, but they have a lot of traditional folk tales of a shrewd squirrel-like-animal. We did add a footnote to explain the literal meaning in the original.”
In Komba, the extended phrase that is translated in English as “be wise as serpents and innocent as doves” was translated as “live without falsity and with wisdom and straightness” since “the picture was too strange.” (Source: Deibler / Taylor 1977, p. 1076f.)
The Greek that is translated in English as “like sheep in the midst of wolves” or similar is translated in Berik as “like chicks in the middle of chicken hawks.” (Source: Kroneman 2004, p. 536)
See also wolf and the evil one does not touch them.
“Sheep are known throughout most of the world, even though, as in Central Africa, they are a far cry from the fleecy wool-producing animals of colder climates. Where such animals are known, even by seemingly strange names, e.g. ‘cotton deer’ (Yucateco) or ‘woolly goat’ (Inupiaq), such names should be used. In some instances, one may wish to borrow a name and use a classifier, e.g. ‘an animal called sheep’. In still other instances translators have used ‘animal which produces wool’, for though people are not acquainted with the animals they are familiar with wool.” (Source: Bratcher / Nida)
In Dëne Súline, it is usually translated as “an evil little caribou.” To avoid the negative connotation, a loan word from the neighboring South Slavey was used. (Source: NCAM, p. 70)
Note that the often-alleged Inuktitut translation of “sheep” with “seal” is an urban myth (source Nida 1947, p. 136).
See also lamb.
The Hebrew and Greek that is translated as “dove” or “pigeon” in English is translated in Pijin with the onomatopoeia kurrukurru. (Source: Bob Carter)
Following are a number of back-translations of Matthew 10:16:
- Uma: “Be careful, because I command you to go in the midst/between evil people. You will be like sheep among serigalas [jackals]. You must be scheming/crafty like a tarsier, but your hearts must be gentle/smooth with no evil intentions.” (Source: Uma Back Translation)
- Yakan: “‘Be careful because I send you to bad people. You are figuratively like offspring of sheep going among masses of fierce dogs. Therefore your thinking/reasoning must be deep (being wise) and you must be only good in your livers.” (Source: Yakan Back Translation)
- Western Bukidnon Manobo: “Listen, you all. I am sending you to harmful people. But as for you, you, by contrast, are not harmful. You are like sheep, and they are like lions. It is necessary that you be on your guard, but don’t you do anything harmful to anyone.” (Source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
- Kankanaey: “Jesus continued saying, ‘Think-about this. I send you to cruel people, as-if you are sheep who go to the location of vicious dogs. It is thus necessary that you be wise/intelligent and prudent/careful with nothing also that can be blamed on you.” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
- Tagbanwa: “Jesus said further, ‘Well now/today, I am sending you out like you are sheep among a large-gathering of wild-dogs. Therefore you must use-your-heads(fig.) like snakes and be tame like doves.” (Source: Tagbanwa Back Translation)
- Tenango Otomi: “Now I am sending you to where evil people live, it will be fearful like when sheep arrive where dangerous animals live. But be wise, being careful like snakes are. Yet do not fight anyone, be like doves who do not want to fight.” (Source: Tenango Otomi Back Translation)
Like many languages (but unlike Greek or Hebrew or English), Tuvan uses a formal vs. informal 2nd person pronoun (a familiar vs. a respectful “you”). Unlike other languages that have this feature, however, the translators of the Tuvan Bible have attempted to be very consistent in using the different forms of address in every case a 2nd person pronoun has to be used in the translation of the biblical text.
As Voinov shows in Pronominal Theology in Translating the Gospels (in: The Bible Translator 2002, p. 210ff.), the choice to use either of the pronouns many times involved theological judgment. While the formal pronoun can signal personal distance or a social/power distance between the speaker and addressee, the informal pronoun can indicate familiarity or social/power equality between speaker and addressee.
Here, Jesus is addressing his disciples, individuals and/or crowds with the formal pronoun, showing respect.
In most Dutch translations, Jesus addresses his disciples and common people with the informal pronoun, whereas they address him with the formal form.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.