bottomless pit

The now commonly-used English idiom “bottomless pit” (for something that holds a very large amount of something) was first coined in 1526 in the English New Testament translation of William Tyndale (spelled as bottomlesse pytt) for the Greek abussos. (Source: Crystal 2010, p. 289)

For other idioms in English that were coined by Bible translation, see here.

afraid (terrified)

The Greek that is translated as “terrified” in English versions is idiomatically translated in Thai as “their souls flee and bile stirs up” or in Chichewa as “their hearts came outside.”

See also afraid and also Seat of the Mind for traditional views of “ways of knowing, thinking, and feeling.”

complete verse (Revelation 1:17)

Following are a number of back-translations of Revelation 1:17:

  • Uma: “When I saw him thus, down I fell prone in front of him, I was like a dead person. From there, he placed his right hand on my body and he said to me, ‘Do not be afraid. I am the beginning and the end.” (Source: Uma Back Translation)
  • Yakan: “When I saw him, immediately I fell at his feet. I was like a dead person. But he placed his right hand on me and said, ‘Don’t be afraid. I am the beginning and the end of all things.” (Source: Yakan Back Translation)
  • Western Bukidnon Manobo: “And when I saw Him I fell on my face in front of Him, and it was as if I were dead. He placed His right hand on me and He said, ‘Don’t be afraid because I am the origin and the ending of everything.” (Source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
  • Kankanaey: “When I saw him, I fell-over before him as if I were dead. But he laid his right hand on me and said, ‘Don’t (sing.) be afraid, because I am the first and last.” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
  • Tagbanwa: “When I saw him, I went down on my face at his feet. I couldn’t respond because it was like I was lifeless. But he touched me with his right hand and said, ‘Don’t be afraid. I am the one who is first before all and also I am the one who is right at the end. Everything is really in my control.” (Source: Tagbanwa Back Translation)
  • Tenango Otomi: “Seeing him standing there, I fell, arriving at his feet like a dead person. He put out his hand, his right one, and touched me. He said to me: ‘ Do not be afraid. I am the one who was living when all things began to exist, and I will be continuing to live when there is the end.” (Source: Tenango Otomi Back Translation)

pronoun for "God"

God transcends gender, but most languages are limited to grammatical gender expressed in pronouns. In the case of English, this is traditionally confined to “he” (or in the forms “his,” “him,” and “himself”), “she” (and “her,” “hers,” and “herself”), and “it” (and “its” and “itself”).

Modern Mandarin Chinese, however, offers another possibility. Here, the third-person singular pronoun is always pronounced the same (tā), but it is written differently according to its gender (他 is “he,” 她 is “she,” and 它/牠 is “it” and their respective derivative forms). In each of these characters, the first (or upper) part defines the gender (man, woman, or thing/animal), while the second element gives the clue to its pronunciation.

In 1930, after a full century with dozens of Chinese translations, Bible translator Wang Yuande (王元德) coined a new “godly” pronoun: 祂. Chinese readers immediately knew how to pronounce it: tā. But they also recognized that the first part of that character, signifying something spiritual, clarified that each person of the Trinity has no gender aside from being God.

While the most important Protestant and Catholic Chinese versions respectively have opted not to use 祂, some Bible translations do and it is widely used in hymnals and other Christian materials. Among the translations that use 祂 to refer to “God” were early versions of Lü Zhenzhong’s (呂振中) version (New Testament: 1946, complete Bible: 1970). R.P. Kramers (in The Bible Translator 1956, p. 152ff.) explains why later versions of Lü’s translation did not continue with this practice: “This new way of writing ‘He,’ however, has created a minor problem of its own: must this polite form be used whenever Jesus is referred to? Lü follows the rule that, wherever Jesus is referred to as a human being, the normal ta (他) is written; where he is referred to as divine, especially after the ascension, the reverential ta (祂) is used.”

In Kouya, Godié, Northern Grebo, Eastern Krahn, Western Krahn, and Guiberoua Béte, all languages of the Kru family in Western Africa, a different kind of systems of pronouns is used (click or tap here to read more):

In that system one kind of pronoun is used for humans (male and female alike) and one for natural elements, non-liquid masses, and some spiritual entities (one other is used for large animals and another one for miscellaneous items). While in these languages the pronoun for spiritual entities used to be employed when referring to God, this has changed into the use of the human pronoun.

Lynell Zogbo (in The Bible Translator 1989, p. 401ff) explains in the following way: “From informal discussions with young Christians especially, it would appear that, at least for some people, the experience and/or concepts of Christianity are affecting the choice of pronoun for God. Some people explain that God is no longer ‘far away,’ but is somehow tangible and personal. For these speakers God has shifted over into the human category.”

In Kouya, God (the Father) and Jesus are referred to with the human pronoun ɔ, whereas the Holy Spirit is referred to with a non-human pronoun. (Northern Grebo and Western Krahn make a similar distinction.)

Eddie Arthur, a former Kouya Bible translation consultant, says the following: “We tried to insist that this shouldn’t happen, but the Kouya team members were insistent that the human pronoun for the Spirit would not work.”

In Burmese, the pronoun ko taw (ကိုယ်တော်) is used either as 2nd person (you) or 3rd person (he, him, his) reference. “This term clearly has its root in the religious language in Burmese. No ordinary persons are addressed or known by this pronoun because it is reserved for Buddhist monks, famous religious teachers, and in the case of Christianity, the Trinity.” (Source: Gam Seng Shae in The Bible Translator 2002, p. 202ff.)

In Thai, the pronoun phra`ong (พระองค์) is used, a gender-neutral pronoun which must refer to a previously introduced royal or divine being. Similarly, in Northern Khmer, which is spoken in Thailand, “an honorific divine pronoun” is used for the pronoun referring to the persons of the Trinity (source: David Thomas in The Bible Translator 1993, p. 445). In Urak Lawoi’, another language spoken in Thailand, the translation often uses tuhat (ตูฮัด) — “God” — ”as a divine pronoun where Thai has phra’ong even though it’s actually a noun.” (Source for Thai and Urak Lawoi’: Stephen Pattemore)

The English “Contemporary Torah” addresses the question of God and gendered pronouns by mostly avoiding pronouns in the first five books of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament (unless God is referred to as “lord,” “father,” “king,” or “warrior”). It does that by either using passive constructs (“He gave us” vs. “we were given”), by using the adjective “divine” or by using “God” rather than a pronoun.

Some Protestant English Bibles use a referential capitalized spelling when referring to the persons of the Trinity with “He,” “His,” “Him,” or “Himself.” This includes for instance the New American Standard Bible, but most translations, especially those published in the 21st century, do not. Two other languages where this is also done (in most Bible translations) are the closely related Indonesian and Malay. In both languages this follows the language usage according to the Qur’an, which in turn predicts that usage (see Soesilo in The Bible Translator 1991, p. 442ff. and The Bible Translator 1997, p. 433ff. ).

See also this chapter in the World Atlas of Language Structures on different approaches to personal pronouns.

Translation: Chinese

在现代汉语中,第三人称单数代词的读音都是一样的(tā),但是写法并不一样,取决于性别以及是否有生命,即男性为“他”,女性为“她”,动物、植物和无生命事物为“它”(在香港和台湾的汉语使用,动物则为“牠”)。这些字的部首偏旁表明了性别(男人、女人、动物、无生命事物),而另一偏旁通常旁提示发音。

到1930年为止,基督教新教《圣经》经过整整一百年的翻译已经拥有了十几个译本,当时的一位圣经翻译者王元德新造了一个“神圣的”代词“祂”,偏旁“礻”表示神明。一般汉语读者会立即知道这字的发音是tā,而这个偏旁表示属灵的事物,因此他们明白这个字指出,三位一体的所有位格都没有性别之分,而单单是上帝。

然而,最重要的新教圣经译本(1919年的《和合本》)和天主教圣经译本(1968年的《思高圣经》)都没有采用“祂”;虽然如此,许多其他的圣经译本采用了这个字,另外还广泛出现在赞美诗和其他基督信仰的书刊中。(资料来源:Zetzsche)

《吕振中译本》的几个早期版本也使用“祂”来指称“上帝”;这个译本的《新约》于1946年译成,整部《圣经》于1970年完成。克拉默斯(Kramers)指出:“‘他’的这种新写法(即‘祂’)产生了一个小问题,就是在指称耶稣的时候,是否一律使用这个敬语代词?《吕振中译本》遵循的原则是,在称呼耶稣这个人的时候,用一般的‘他’,而在称呼耶稣神性的时候,特别是升天之后的耶稣,则用尊称‘祂’。”

Translator: Simon Wong

Translation commentary on Revelation 1:17 – 1:18

When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead: John’s reaction is like those of others in the Bible who were suddenly confronted by the presence of the Almighty; see Ezek 1.28; Dan 8.17; 10.9; Matt 17.6; Acts 26.14. The verb fell here does not mean that he collapsed to the ground in a dead faint, but that he prostrated himself at the feet of the glorified Christ, with forehead and body touching the ground in an act of worship and reverence, and lay there as though he were dead. Other ways of expressing fell are “bowed down low to the ground” or “spread myself flat on the ground.” At his feet in certain languages will be rendered as “near his feet,” “by his feet,” or even “in front of his feet” or “in front of him.”

As though dead may also be expressed as “without moving,” “as if I was dead,” or “completely rigid like a person who has died.”

Both with his gesture (he laid his right hand upon me) and with his words (Fear not), the resurrected and glorified Christ reassures John, commissions him to write (verse 19), and explains the meaning of the seven stars and the seven lampstands (verse 20). In some languages the clause he laid his right hand upon me will be rendered as “he stretched out his right hand and placed it on me.”

Fear not will often be expressed as “stop being afraid.” Fear is rendered idiomatically in many languages; for example, “heart (or, liver) trembles,” “liver shivers,” “heart (or, liver) falls,” or even “his heart came outside” (Chewa).

I am the first and the last: the meaning is the same as “I am the Alpha and the Omega” of verse 8.

The living one: this is also a divine title, and a translation may wish to make this explicit. It is used by the resurrected Christ, who had been raised from death and now lives forever. This phrase can also be expressed as “the one who has life” or “the one who gives life.”

I died, and behold I am alive for evermore: the meaning of the first statement, in this context, is better expressed by Good News Translation “I was dead” (also New Revised Standard Version, Revised English Bible, New Jerusalem Bible).

Behold: this translates an interjection that calls attention to what follows (see 1.7); it occurs twenty-six times in this book. It is not represented by a verbal equivalent in various translations (thus Bible en français courant, Biblia Dios Habla Hoy, Nova Tradução na Linguagem de Hoje, Revised English Bible). New Revised Standard Version has “and see,” which at least is not obsolete, as behold is. A translator must decide if a distinct word is necessary in order to emphasize what follows. I am alive for evermore can also be rendered as “I have life that never ends.” For the translation of the phrase for evermore, see the comments on 1.6, where the Greek for “for ever and ever” is the same expression as for evermore in this verse.

I have the keys of Death and Hades: keys are the symbol of authority, and by having been raised from death, the glorified Christ has the power over death and the world of the dead; he has the power to leave people in death or to open the gates of Hades (see Isa 38.10; Matt 16.18 [RSV footnote]) and let its inhabitants leave. This, of course, is a figure for the power to bring the dead to life. In some languages it will be possible to keep the symbol keys and say, for example, “I have the keys that give me the power to open the place where dead people are (or, the land of the dead) and bring them to life again.” In cultures where keys do not exist, one may say “the things that open or close doors” or “the power to open doors.” Death: in languages where one cannot talk about “power over death,” one may say “power to raise people from death” or “power to cause dead people to be alive again.” Hades (also 6.8; 20.13, 14) is the Greek equivalent of Sheol, the Hebrew word for the world of the dead, which was sometimes pictured as an underground city, whose locked gates prevented the dead from leaving. It should not be translated “hell,” that is, the place of punishment, which in the New Testament is called “Gehenna.” Biblia Dios Habla Hoy has joined the two terms, “I have the keys of the kingdom of death,” which a translation may choose to imitate.

An alternative translation model for this verse is:

• I am the one who is the source of (or, who gives) life. I was dead, but now I am alive for all time to come. I have the keys that give me the power to open or close the place where dead people are (or, the land of the dead) and bring them to life again.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Hatton, Howard A. A Handbook on The Revelation to John. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1993. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Revelation 11:7

They have finished their testimony: this refers to their witness, the message given by God for them to proclaim.

The beast that ascends from the bottomless pit: for bottomless pit see 9.1. In chapters 13-20 two or perhaps three different beasts appear (mentioned some thirty-seven times), and in some passages it is difficult to tell which one is meant. Besides these various beasts there is also the dragon, who first appears in 12.3. The word translated beast means simply “animal” (see 6.8), and An American Translation and Phillips translate here “the animal,” which is a bit strange in English. A translator must find, if possible, a distinctive word for these creatures. Perhaps use can be made of words taken from legends or fairy tales, where fantastic animals are fairly common. Here something like “monster” or “wild beast,” or even “ogre,” may be appropriate. It is probable that this beast is the same one that appears in 13.1.

Will make war upon them and conquer them and kill them: in this context to make war is not quite natural; something like “will attack them” or “will fight them” is better. And for conquer the verb “defeat” is more natural here.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Hatton, Howard A. A Handbook on The Revelation to John. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1993. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .